Share with your CMO/CRO
The argument driving this customer experience strategy piece is blunt: AI doesn’t fix broken CX, it scales it. Veteran revenue operator Bob Ronan, drawing on three decades across banking, fintech, SaaS and insurance, contends that companies buying copilots and intelligent automation before defining the emotion they want customers to feel are accelerating their own dysfunction. The prescription is outside-in design, emotion-first journey mapping, CRM fields that capture verbatim customer impact, CSAT alongside lagging NPS, objective escalation thresholds, and a named executive whose explicit job is to ask how customers will experience a decision before it ships.
What this means for your business
Whether this argument applies to your organization comes down to one diagnostic question: if your CRO, CMO and Chief Customer Officer sat down today and wrote one sentence describing the emotion your product should leave customers with, would the three sentences match? Most don’t. Companies that have already done the alignment work Ronan describes are positioned to get real acceleration from AI investment. Companies that haven’t are about to find out what “scaling dysfunction” feels like at enterprise speed.
The CRM point deserves more attention than it typically gets in AI conversations. Most organizations treat their CRM as an activity log, recording that an issue occurred rather than what it cost the customer. Ronan’s contrast is instructive: “implementation delay” versus “the customer missed their board meeting and lost credibility with their executive team.” That gap isn’t a technology problem. It’s a leadership configuration problem, and no AI layer on top of thin data produces accurate churn prediction, health scoring or renewal forecasting. The garbage-in problem is older than AI, but AI makes it more consequential because the downstream decisions now move faster and carry more weight.
The incentive misalignment point is where the argument bites hardest. Ronan is writing from a position of having built revenue organizations, so his skepticism about companies that “claim CX is their highest priority then compensate almost entirely on new revenue” carries operational weight rather than consulting abstraction. If your compensation structure doesn’t tie any meaningful variable to retention, customer health scores or advocacy metrics, your AI-powered CX initiative is a marketing exercise. The leading indicator to watch isn’t NPS, which by Ronan’s own framing is already months stale when you read it. It’s whether the executive cadence reviewing customer health gets the same calendar weight as the pipeline call, and right now, at most companies, it doesn’t.
Based on reporting from Everyone’s Selling AI-Powered CX. Almost No One’s Asking What CX Should Feel Like., originally published 2026-07-28 13:20:00.
