Share with your CFO
FIFA’s $20 billion asset sale collapsed in four days, and the financial structure is why. The plan, fronted by Josh Kushner’s Thrive Eternal and run by JPMorgan, would have sold 20% of FIFA’s commercial rights portfolio for $4.2 billion. The fatal detail: the $20 million payment promised to each of FIFA’s 211 member federations for a yes vote multiplied out to $4.22 billion, nearly identical to the raise itself. The sources-and-uses table confessed the whole thing before UEFA’s boycott or any political noise could.
What this means for your business
The FIFA fiasco is a clean case study in what happens when deal rationale serves the dealmaker rather than the organization. CFOs who sit across from a transaction where the use of proceeds finances the consent mechanism, paying voters with investor capital, are not looking at a capital raise. They’re looking at a structure that requires the vote to succeed before it can justify itself. That circularity is the signal. It doesn’t matter how prestigious the bank running the process is, or how politically connected the buyer. The numbers say no before anyone in the room does.
Jason Hershman, writing as a fractional CFO with a natural interest in positioning deal hygiene as a CFO superpower, still gets the core analysis right, and the framing holds even stripped of advocacy. The tell he identifies, a cash-flush, debt-free organization with $4.8 billion in reserves selling permanent equity with a four-day runway and a single pre-selected buyer, is exactly the pattern that should trigger a sources-and-uses audit in any organization. Permanent equity is the right instrument when there’s a permanent funding problem. FIFA’s problem was a term-limited president, which is a governance issue, not a capital structure issue.
The second-order consequence here is about internal deal velocity as a red flag rather than a green one. Speed in a complex transaction often signals that scrutiny is the thing being outrun. CFOs weighing any externally-proposed structure involving asset monetization, whether a sale-leaseback, a rights carve-out, or a joint venture, should weigh whether the timeline is shaped by genuine market conditions or by someone’s need to close before questions can compound. If the deadline is doing most of the work, the deadline is the problem.
Concept deep-dive: Sources and uses
A sources-and-uses table is the first page of any deal memo, listing where capital comes from and where it goes. It exists because the stated purpose of a raise and its actual economic destination are not always the same thing. Think of it as a flow-of-funds receipt. In FIFA’s case, the table would have shown investor capital flowing directly to federation payments, the very parties whose approval validated the deal. When the source and the use are the same number, the transaction is not raising capital. It is recycling it.
Based on reporting from It took 4 days to stop FIFA’s $20B deal. It should’ve taken 10 minutes., originally published 2026-08-04 08:58:00.
