Share with your COO
Industrial and professional services firms are running a measurement system that actively undermines the business they’re trying to build. Billable utilization has dropped to roughly 66%, well below the 70-75% healthy range, while EBITDA margins have slid into single digits, even as managers push the efficiency dials harder. The core argument is that delivery metrics measure motion while outcome and growth metrics measure value, and conflating the two is costing industrial firms their highest-margin revenue engine: aftermarket services running at roughly 2.5x the margin of new equipment sales.
What this means for your business
The companies on the right side of this divide share one trait: they gave service its own P&L and its own scorecard. Caterpillar targets $28 billion in services revenue by 2026 and reports customers using its digital tools spend up to 33% more on aftermarket. Hilti manages 1.5 million tools under recurring contracts with customer retention roughly five times higher than its old sales model. If your service organization reports into operations as a cost function rather than a revenue line, you’re almost certainly measuring the wrong things and pricing the installed base below its real value.
AI sharpens this problem faster than most COOs expect. TSIA labels it the AI Value Paradox: when automation compresses the time to deliver a result, any firm that prices and measures by hours watches revenue shrink precisely as it improves. Utilization falls, the dashboard looks broken, and leadership responds by pushing efficiency harder, which is exactly backwards. The proposed replacement metric is absorption, value and revenue delivered relative to cost. Absorption captures whether the work was worth doing; utilization only captures whether people were busy. Those are different questions with different answers, and the gap between them widens every time an AI agent closes a ticket a technician used to bill for.
The governance risk buried in this shift is the one most reorganizations miss. Once “grow service revenue” becomes the executive target, the fastest lever isn’t better outcomes, it’s raising parts prices 30-50% above independent alternatives and forcing bundle contracts on a captive installed base. OEMs doing exactly that are already losing share to independent aftermarket providers, who now control roughly three-quarters of US automotive parts sales. Growth metrics without pricing transparency and customer-outcome ownership don’t measure value creation, they reward extraction, and the defection shows up 12 to 36 months later when the decision that caused it is long forgotten. The scorecard you use to judge your service business is effectively a choice about which behavior you want your organization to repeat.
Concept deep-dive: Net Revenue Retention
Net revenue retention (NRR) measures how much revenue a company generates from its existing customer base over time, including expansions, contractions, and churn, expressed as a percentage of prior-period revenue. Think of it as the installed base’s report card. It exists because top-line revenue growth can mask a leaking bucket, strong new sales covering accelerating losses from existing accounts. For industrial services, NRR makes the aftermarket annuity visible in a single number that a fix-rate dashboard simply cannot produce.
Based on reporting from Customer Experience vs. Utilization: The Metrics Battle Reshaping Industrial Services, originally published 2026-07-10 13:11:00.
